Being in charge of filling a Sales pipeline is a tough spot for any Marketing person. Not only are legitimate sales opportunities difficult to find, but when it comes to actually defining what a ‘lead’ looks like, beauty is often in the eye of the beholder. There are literally dozens of ways to classify incoming inquiries generated by outbound marketing efforts, and every marketing and sales person has their favorite; which inevitably leads to two things: 1) Sales accusing Marketing of being incompetent, and 2) Marketing accusing Sales of being lazy.
The definition of the word ‘lead,’ over and above everything else, is the single most common reason Marketing and Sales people don’t mingle at the company picnic. And as a 17+ year marketing professional I can say with some degree of certainty that in most cases, it is our fault. Contrary to what we learned in the 1990s, a trade show attendee who swaps a business card for a blinky pen is not something a good sales person should be interested in. Neither is a name poached from a website, or the spouse of a friend who knows someone in the Purchasing Department at Company X. If we as Marketing people are ever going to regain the confidence of our counterparts in Sales, we need to understand the difference between things that feed a Sales pipeline, and things that should be feeding a paper shredder.
The Name
The first and therefore least significant thing a marketing person can pass along to sales is called a Name, and is defined as follows:
General contact information, acquired from a general source, where no context is given.
Note that use of the word ‘general’ twice in the above definition is not a mistake, but rather a way to diminish the perceived value of a Name. Marketing people acquire Names from any number of places—business card drops at a trade shows, website downloads, mailing lists, industry association member registers, and so on—but the manner in which a Name was acquired does not increase its value. Most Sales people are savvy enough to acquire a Name on their own, and have every right to be insulted when a Marketing person attempts to give them one and pass it off as something that has potential revenue attached to it.
The Lead
The second level of inbound inquiry, and the one most people are familiar with by name, is a Lead. The definition of a Lead—which applies to most companies and in most situations—is as follows:
The name and direct contact information of someone within your target demographic who is looking for more information, and has given your company permission to follow up with them.
As outlined above, there are four important components that must exist before Marketing can declare something a Lead:
- Direct contact information;
- Confirmation that the Name is within your target demographic;
- A desire on behalf of the contact for more information; and
- Permission to follow up.
What happens to a Lead after Marketing receives it varies from company to company. Some firms enter them into the Marketing ‘machine’ to receive automated follow up, some companies pass them to an Inside Sales-type of role for cultivation, and some companies pass them directly to an Outside Sales function. But wherever they are sent, Leads are the second-most valuable thing a Marketer can uncover, with the most valuable being . . .
The Opportunity!
The third type of marketing-driven inquiry—and the most difficult one to generate—is the Opportunity. An Opportunity is something Sales people expect, Marketing executives demand, and professional marketers rarely achieve. The definition of an Opportunity is as follows:
The name and contact information of someone who has expressed interest in making a purchase from you, has an established budget, and is either an influencer in the decision-making process or the primary decision-maker.
Based on this definition, in order to legitimately refer to an inquiry as an Opportunity, the following three things must exist in addition to the components listed in the previous section:
- A demonstrated need for (or want of) whatever your company has to offer;
- Verification that the money exists to purchase what is being offered; and
- Proof that the contact can either make the decision, or bend the ear of someone who can.
Much like the word ‘general’ when referring to a Name, the words demonstrated, verification and proof carry special meaning here. All too often, Marketing people get caught in what I refer to as the Think-Feel-Believe Trap when passing prospects onto Sales—”I think they need what we offer, I feel the client has the money, and I believe the contact is a decision-maker.” If the prospect didn’t clearly and specifically state his or her need, budget and decision-making power, what you have is nothing more than a Lead, which will eventually a) require significantly more effort to close, and b) make your Sales Department mistrust you.
The bottom line is, filling a Sales pipeline as a marketer is about more than simply keeping the Sales staff busy. It’s also about maintaining your reputation and credibility with the people who depend upon you for their paychecks. The most sure-fire way to ensure a successful relationship between Marketing and Sales is for the departments to speak the same language, and hopefully this article will help. That way, Marketing and Sales can get back to arguing about issues that REALLY matter—like why Sales people never use the standard PowerPoint templates we make, or why Marketing people refuse to create brochures for products and services that don’t actually exist.
Questions? Comments? Feel free to reply to this post. Also, social bookmarks are as good as currency here at THEsmallCOMPANYBLOG, so a Retweet (button provided above), Stumble or Digg (buttons below) would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
Related Articles You Might Enjoy:
Author: Eric_Rudolf (68 Articles)
Eric Rudolf is Director of Marketing for one of the fastest-growing professional development and training companies in the world. Eric's work has been republished and Retweeted by The Rainmaker Report, The Social Media Guide, WhyPR, Elite Tech Jobs, Microsoft Small Business, and others. If every job paid the same, Eric would restore old houses or shoot pool for a living.


December 1st, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by TSCB: @JMJb2bleads Hi: Just posted a new Marketing / Sales article. Any chance of another Retweet? Thanks in advance! http://tinyurl.com/ygr8sue...
February 10th, 2010 at 11:01 pm
Great article Eric! Thanks for the common-sense approach to an often murky topic.
February 11th, 2010 at 3:22 pm
Hi Jann:
You’re welcome, and thanks for taking the time to comment! I think “murky” is a great word to describe the topic in general–sales and marketing often get into this endless accusational loop of “Your leads are no good!” from Sales people and “You’re not following up on them correctly!” from Marketing people. Inevitably, some CEO or VP who has no real visibility into the issue ends up trying to break the tie, and things get ugly.
Thanks again for the comments!
June 24th, 2010 at 12:13 pm
Eric,
I enjoyed your article. There are some great tips here for bridging the divide between sales and marketing. “Can’t we all just get along?”
Kind regards,
Andy
June 28th, 2010 at 11:20 am
Hi Andy:
Thanks for taking the time to write! Sadly, I think we will always live in a world where Marketing and Sales people are looking over our shoulders at each other. When one isn’t doing their job, it’s too convenient to blame the other. But we can dare to dream, right?
Thanks again!
- Eric -